Skip to main content

NYT claims replacing Bloody, Barbaric invader Mughals with Shivaji as Intolerant.

Report Id: 2243

NYT claims replacing Bloody, Barbaric invader Mughals with Shivaji as Intolerant.

Description
The article takes it for granted that the Mughal period is one worthy of remembrance and recognition in a museum, ignoring the fact that the Mughals destroyed much of Hindu culture and caused a genocide of Hindus. The idea of building a museum of Chhatrapati Shivaji in Agra instead of one for the Mughals is seen as ridiculous since "Agra is not a city of Shivaji", almost implying that Agra should be now dedicated to the Mughals (even though the Mughal period is one of much devastation).



Media Bias

Sameer Yasir